EQ: 9.26.18
FR: 9.27.18
Full submission: 9.27.18
R&R: 1.10.19

EQ 9/11/17( Diplomatic Immunity)
FR 11/13/17 (Asked for full and full synopsis from nudge. Said story was super-exciting.)
Update: Full sent on 10/1/18!
ER 1/2/18 (Passed with personalized feedback, no response for a R&R)

Dan Hammons, I've got a response from Gina. Nudge if you have to!

EQ 11/16/2018
ER 12/06/2018 (answered by Tia Mele)

sci-fi/mystery

EQ: 12/3/18
PR: 12/13/18 from assistant Tianna Mignogna and sent same day with synopsis also attached.
100k Fantasy
This is the first time I've had two submissions out at once!

EQ 12.2.18
ER 12.13.18 - personalized email with very helpful and complimentary feedback
100k thriller

Profile Update: Closed to queries.

Follow-up on my post dated 10/15/18. I emailed Gina and her assistants (in October) and haven't receive a reply from any of them. It feels like I've been ghosted.

Gina and her assistants have been pleasant and kind when I've been able to contact them - but that's the catch. It's been difficult to get a reply. Even after having my manuscript make it through positive reads from the interns and Gina, no "yes" or "no." Just nothing.

EQ: 11/12/18 - Mystery/SF
ER: 12/06/18 - "The story sounds interesting, but it's a bit too similar to something we are working on with one of our current clients, so we're not the best agency to represent the project."

So much for the idea of querying agents who represent novels similar to the one you wrote ...

She’s open for a few more days KellyE. She doesn’t close until the 11rh.

Gina is closed to queries until 21 January 2019

EQ 10/20/18 - SF Space Opera, 103k Words
ER 11/24/18 - Pleasant, helpful, personalized email rejection. They liked the query and found the plot strong, but they found some issues with the writing that kept it from clicking with them. Bummer, but I'll be happy to use the feedback to improve!

I sometimes wish there was a third option besides "Form Rejection" and "Helpful Feedback."

I, like others, received what was definitely a personalised rejection, but the feedback from Gina's assistant was confusing, contradictory, and unclear. And as we're not really "allowed" to contact an agent/assistant after a rejection, I'm left without clarity on her suggestions. I showed my CPs and they were equally confused.

Given some previous comments below, I think I have to chalk this up to not the right agent for me. It's nice that her assistant feeds back, as others have noted, but it almost feels like a few stock phrases -- and sometimes those stock phrases are in direct contradiction to each other. Moving on.

10/22 queried Gina, 60K fantasy
11/19 kind rejection letter

I also received a thoughtful response from her assistant that made me me feel they actually read the material, but decided to pass

DVpit EQ: 11/15/18

Contemporary Romance/WF, 70k

10/06 queried Gina. 145k sci-fi
11/07 kind rejection.
Gina, or Tia her assistant, was more than I had expected for a rejection. Her e-mail was well received and she told me, "We think the story sounds interesting, but it's not quite right for our list at this time."
I know it's a rejection non the less, but her tact in wording was genuine and sincere. It helped me to believe she had read what I sent... even if it was before the latest revisions I've made. She's a good agent in my opinion, for whatever that helps others in their decision making.