Sign In
Literary Agents

Ms. Aimee Ashcraft

Brower Literary & Management

110 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

E-Mail: To protect agents from spam, email addresses are hidden except to logged-in members. Join Now


Twitter: AimeeAshcraft

AAR Member: No

Accepts Queries Via...

Snail-Mail: No

E-Mail: Yes

Online Form: No

Learn more about this agent, including:

  • Genres of Interest
  • Typical Response Times
  • Best Query Methods

Become a QueryTracker Member (Free)

Query Guidelines

Subject line should read: "QUERY: [Manuscript/Project Title]" Include a query letter, a full synopsis (which should summarize the entire book), and your first chapter, pasted into the email, double-spaced. No attachments please.

Leave comments about your experiences with this literary agent, or read what other authors have to say.

from abreitwrite
Sep 19, 2018 12:32 pm

EQ: 7/26/18
No response, resent query as "nudge": 9/4/18
from tome129
Aug 17, 2018 1:58 pm

EQ: 8/3/2018

Historical fiction 98k words
from jessoterick
Aug 10, 2018 3:57 pm

EQ - 8/8/18
Immediate Out of Office notification for 8/7-8/8
FR - 8/9 (lovely reply letting me know she got it after sending)
from floridagal007
Aug 01, 2018 3:14 pm

EQ January 2018
Marked CNR March 2018

Queried another agent at Brower in July 2018, who declined interest, but cc'd Aimee who wanted to read the full MS. Full sent 8/1.

Funny how things work!

HF 104k
from Mldtay
Jul 31, 2018 7:08 pm

EQ: 7/20/18 YA Fantasy 96K
from dogmobile1
Jul 25, 2018 6:24 am

Never received a response to my first query. Site says to nudge after 6-8 weeks. I resent query with nudge at ~10 weeks. Still never heard back.

Looks like many of the comments indicate Aimee has had a problem with receiving queries or being responsive, sometimes blaming her spam folder (really, it's the 21st century and you're a literary agent). I'm thinking in light of how she conducts her business that I'm better off she rejected my query (at least I think she rejected it).
from Ninka2016
Jul 10, 2018 1:13 pm

EQ 7/10
from thewhipslip
Jul 08, 2018 1:26 pm

EQ: 7/8/2018

YA Fantasy, 67K
from tdubphyz
May 31, 2018 10:40 am

EQ: 3/27
FR: 5/31 (after a nudge—apparently my initial query never went through!)

lit fic, 92k
from cmandrewslit
May 28, 2018 1:36 pm

EQ: 5/28/18
FR: 5/28/18

YA Historical Fantasy 96k
from Miggie
Apr 18, 2018 7:25 pm

EQ: 11/10/2017
FR: 01/05/2018

(Was waiting for the inevitable rejection before recording my full requests, but didn't realise just how slowly things move and the information might be useful for someone in the meantime. Also, it gives me something to do while waiting >_<)

Update: nudged on 04/18 and received ER with some personal comments several hours later.
from FalthoWitch
Jan 08, 2018 6:48 pm

EQ: 10/23/2017
CNR: 01/08/2018
YA fantasy 83k
from normalman
Dec 20, 2017 9:29 pm

EQ 5/30/17
ER 12/20/17

Very polite personalized note discussing my proposal and explaining why it wasn't for her.
from LightofBeauty
Nov 07, 2017 10:24 pm

EQ: 9/10
FR: 9/10 (She confirmed receipt same day, much appreciated!)
FR: 10/19 Nudged, because it has been well over a month, and since others have gotten responses to their fulls within 4 weeks, figured I'd nudge. She said my book is still under consideration, and that she's behind on reading manuscripts and hasn't went deep into mine yet. So if some of you are still waiting like I am: she's just a bit behind.

As someone has mentioned already, but it deserves credit since so few agents do this: Aimee is soo responsive! She doesn't take days/weeks/months to get back to you from a nudge, very quick and responsive, and her enthusiasm is so nice to see!

ER: 11/7

A "personalized" form that is very similar to everyone else's below. It SOUNDS sincerely personalized, like it's not just a one-click form rejection, which is appreciated, but it's painfully formulaic. Like the forms that people posted below, she first says "I like that you ____," (first says something nice and positive to soften the blow), then she says "___ and ____ will appeal to a wide range of readers," (throws you a bone to make you feel that your work has merit somewhere) and then, "however, as I read I couldn't personally connect with voice of ____" then the super form-y "for this reason I can't represent it."

That's how formulaic it is, it's almost word-for-word to the rejection(s) that others have posted below, "personalized," sure, but not really. It's a point A to point B, fill in the blank style, completely useless and unhelpful. It is essentially just another "didn't connect with voice" form rejection disguised as a "personalized" one with mention of book title, naming of characters, and summarizing general themes of the work. It's a nice effort to customize to the author's work as a way to show that she read it, but again, it's a formula, and doesn't read as authentic as it tries to be. At the end of the day, it's still a disappointing, canned form with just those add-ons to not make it seem like one.

Aimee is lovely, though, but "personalized" forms like this stick out like a sore thumb after a while lol.
from Catsamoa79
Oct 25, 2017 11:53 am

EQ: 8/1/17
Nudge: 9/28/17, as per agency suggestion
ER: 10/25/17, after having used the contact form on their website to inquire what may have happened to my query. Kimberly Brower investigated and found that both the query and the nudge were in Aimee Ashcraft's spam folder and she would put it at the top of her list. I heard from Aimee within one day, with a nice note of apology and a small bit of helpful feedback. Nice to know how responsive they were once we determined the issue.

To read more comments about this agent, or to leave comments of your own, become a QueryTracker member.

Agent Reports.

QueryTracker Members can view the data gathered by all other members, organized into reports showing...

  • The Number of Queries Sent and Their Replies
  • Query Response Times
  • Most Popular Manuscript Word-Counts
  • Most Popular Genres
  • Historic Trends
  • And Much More