Resubmitted after rejection eariler (but with an offer to review if changes were made) It was such a positive rejection that I followed her "advice" and made changes she recommended. Resubmitted 2/14/25.
Rejected 2/25/25 as she just "did not feel as passionately about it" as she had at first.

Submitted on March 6
High Fantasy 71k
Rejected on 27 march

A particularly disturbing form letter rejection (relevant portion below) feigning constructive criticism based on thoughtful consideration which could easily be taken as actionable advice and lead to unfounded rethinking of one’s entire manuscript. Furthermore, good premises are not easy to come by. Many are overcomplicated, unoriginal, or out of touch with today's market. This form letter encourages writers of such to hold strong in that regard and focus on engagement issues. Specifics within form letter rejections are disingenuous and potentially counter-productive.

"Dear [automated name insertion],

Thank you so much for sharing [automated title insertion] with me. While I found the premise intriguing, I didn't feel as passionately engaged with the story as I'd hoped, and so I will unfortunately have to pass on the project. I apologize — due to the high volume of queries I've received over the past couple weeks, I'm afraid I can't provide more feedback on the project at this time."

Truth is, she provided zero feedback and is taking false credit for what would have been a magnanimous gesture.

75k sci-fi
Query: 1.22
First 50 request: 1.24
Full request: 2.14