Warning: Be aware of scammers impersonating real agents.
Ms. Amanda Elliott
Movable Type Management
Should you query this agent?
Get answers to this, and many more agent questions at QueryTracker.
General
Query Methods
Accepts queries via...
Genres
This agent is seeking the following genres:
Fiction
Crime/Police
Fantasy
• Fantasy, Contemporary/Urban
• Fantasy, High/Epic
• Fantasy, Magical Realism
Horror
Mystery
Romance
• Romance, Category
• Romance, Contemporary
• Romance, Fantasy
• Romance, Historical
• Romance, Paranormal
• Romance, Thriller/Suspense
Thrillers/Suspense
Young Adult
• Young Adult, Fantasy
• Young Adult, Mystery
Non-Fiction
none
Join Now (FREE) to learn more about this agent. (Such as how often and how quickly each agent replies to queries.)
Known Clients (current & past)
none found
Author Comments
Comments by authors about this agent.
MBoesen
07/10/2026 09:58 AM
Q: 2026July10
eswtmon01
07/10/2026 06:16 AM
@Waterbear — Email statistics have to be taken with a huge pinch of salt, which is why I prefer it when an agent uses QueryTracker. The data is generally more accurate and far more useful to a querying author.
A substantial drop in the full-request rate when an agent moves from self-reported email data to QueryTracker is quite common. It is human nature to log the good news and not bother recording the bad:
The full-request rate fell from 5.43% to 1.42% — a 74% reduction, or nearly 4x
The overall request rate fell from 8.22% to 1.42% — an 83% reduction, or nearly 6x
Partial requests fell from 20 out of 718 recorded outcomes to 0 out of 636.
What is more interesting here, and much less common, is that the partial requests have vanished completely. That could be a coincidence, with the agent deciding at the same time that partials were no longer useful and moving directly to full requests. Alternatively, some of the earlier partial requests may have been misreported, misunderstood or exaggerated by the email claimants.
Based on the email figures, this agent appeared to have a remarkable request rate of between 5.43% and 8.22%, depending on whether partials were included. That would make them look as though they were actively building their list and consuming manuscripts the way I consume pastéis de nata.
A lot of querying authors looking only at those email statistics may therefore have formed an impression of the agent that was not actually accurate. A 1.42% request rate is not poor; it sits within the fairly typical 1–2% range we often see. It simply paints a very different picture from the older self-reported figures.
A substantial drop in the full-request rate when an agent moves from self-reported email data to QueryTracker is quite common. It is human nature to log the good news and not bother recording the bad:
The full-request rate fell from 5.43% to 1.42% — a 74% reduction, or nearly 4x
The overall request rate fell from 8.22% to 1.42% — an 83% reduction, or nearly 6x
Partial requests fell from 20 out of 718 recorded outcomes to 0 out of 636.
What is more interesting here, and much less common, is that the partial requests have vanished completely. That could be a coincidence, with the agent deciding at the same time that partials were no longer useful and moving directly to full requests. Alternatively, some of the earlier partial requests may have been misreported, misunderstood or exaggerated by the email claimants.
Based on the email figures, this agent appeared to have a remarkable request rate of between 5.43% and 8.22%, depending on whether partials were included. That would make them look as though they were actively building their list and consuming manuscripts the way I consume pastéis de nata.
A lot of querying authors looking only at those email statistics may therefore have formed an impression of the agent that was not actually accurate. A 1.42% request rate is not poor; it sits within the fairly typical 1–2% range we often see. It simply paints a very different picture from the older self-reported figures.
ntdieudonne
07/10/2026 05:40 AM
Q: 5/6/26
Form Rej: 7/10/26
88k adult BIPOC PNR
Form Rej: 7/10/26
88k adult BIPOC PNR
writethrowclay
07/05/2026 07:21 AM
@Waterbear... yes. She made the switch about two months ago.
Agent Interviews
Interviews with this agent from across the web.
None found for this agent
Success Story Interviews
Read interviews with authors who have signed with this agent.
None found for this agent
Profile History
- Last Update:
- 05/11/2026 - Now using QueryManager.
Disclaimer
Always verify agent's information before sending your query, and review the agent's website(s) for more up-to-date information.
Though we do our best, QueryTracker can not guarantee the accuracy of any information provided.
An agent listing on QueryTracker is not an endorsement or recommendation of that agent by QueryTracker.
Before contacting an agent, authors should verify and assess the agent's requirements and suitability by visiting the agent's website(s), and becoming familiar with ways to spot and avoid bad agents. A good place to start is Writers Beware, a watch group that helps inform and protect authors from shady practices.
Contemporary Romance, 96k
@Waterbear & @eswtmon01, I have also seen with QueryTracker that the stats will show "full request" when it was, in fact, a partial request. I have had numerous partial requests through QT, but in the data explorer and the query timeline, mine shows as a full request. So the partials may still be a thing, but query tracker often doesn't differentiate.